Small cities • 2016

Obec Loučovice

IČO 00245984

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Faspro s.r.o.
1 24,707,634
Spintech s.r.o.
2 8,139,000
Tangenta, spol. s r.o.
1 7,998,718
Meva-tec s.r.o.
1 6,642,583
Framon s.r.o. "v likvidaci"
1 5,195,073
Other suppliers 2 10,255,605

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

71%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
"Loučovice - ČOV a kanalizce - dodatečné stavební práce"
Not disclosed
5,130,720

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

26%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (1 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 50% (4 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 38% (3 from 8)