Small cities • 2016

Město Moravský Krumlov

IČO 00293199

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace sběrného dvora odpadů města Moravský Krumlov
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Energetické úspory objektu Sokolovny, Moravský Krumlov
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
7
Ø4 in industry
Pořízení samosběrného kropícího stroje Moravský Krumlov - II
Kropící vozy
3
Ø3 in industry
„V 000488 – Refinancování stávajícího hypotečního úvěru Města Moravský Krumlov“
Poskytování úvěrů
2
Ø2 in industry
Nosič kontejnerů na tříděný odpad pro město Moravský Krumlov II
Motorová vozidla
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Strabag a.s.
1 12,363,873
Osp, spol. s r.o.
1 11,098,484
Alfa Profi s.r.o.
1 3,612,770
Česká spořitelna, a.s.
1 3,383,020
Agrotec a.s.
1 1,895,000
Other suppliers 2 1,639,526

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

64%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

77%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 29% (2 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)