Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Loket

IČO 00259489

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SLUŽBY MaSS, spol s r.o
1 11,550,000
ISSO - Inženýrské stavby Sokolov, s.r.o.
2 9,371,507
ROCKNET s.r.o.
1 5,887,455
PRVNÍ CHRÁNĚNÁ DÍLNA s.r.o.
1 5,850,218
TIMA spol. s r.o. - obchodně výrobní služby
1 5,246,077

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 51,798,889
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 103,027,747
Total 154,826,636

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

68%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY – DVORANA LOKET, č.p. 312 a č.p. 313, Radniční, Loket
Technical exclusivity
- 3,482,971

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

81%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

21%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.83 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders