Small cities • 2016

Město Rokytnice v Orlických horách

IČO 00275301

Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency. The competition for contracts is high.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Fato a.s., člen holdingu Fato
1 17,982,136
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,393,000
Stylbau, s.r.o.
2 4,360,930
Ekola České Libchavy s.r.o.
1 4,330,398
Haiteco Cz s.r.o.
1 1,362,971
Other suppliers 2 1,339,063

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (2 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 12% (1 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

55%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)