Small cities • 2016

Město Pečky

IČO 00239607

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ZŠ PEČKY, DOSTAVBA II. ETAPA - KUCHYNĚ
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Vodovodní přivaděcí řad Radim - Pečky
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø5 in industry
Za Pečky zelenější!
Zahradnické služby
7
Ø6 in industry
Dokončení rekonstrukce chodníku Tř. Jana Švermy
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce části chodníku Tř. Jana Švermy – změna č.3
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

37%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Dmc Cz, s.r.o.
1 20,314,346
Telsig-servis, spol. s r.o.
1 7,254,763
Halko stavební společnost, s.r.o.
2 2,579,526
Khl-eko, a.s.
1 2,576,599
Daniel Šperk
1 1,239,639
Other suppliers 1 899,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)