Small cities • 2016

Město Kralovice

IČO 00257966

The competition for contracts is high. Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

93%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení Základní školy v Kralovicích
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Kralovice
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky plynu na rok 2013
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce Voleského rybníka
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky plynu na rok 2016
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Miras - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
1 10,883,601
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 4,262,071
Pragoplyn, a.s.
2 4,243,049
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o.
1 2,911,151
Stavmonta spol. s r.o.
1 2,741,629
Other suppliers 3 3,200,803

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sportovní a rekreační areál Kralovice, víceúčelová in-line dráha a koupaliště - dodatečné stavební práce č.1
Dodatečné práce
- 72,888

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (4 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 10% (1 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

54%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 10% (1 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (2 from 10)