Small cities • 2016

Město Klimkovice

IČO 00298051

The competition for contracts is high. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení emisí a energetické úspory Základní školy Klimkovice
Tepelné izolace
8
Ø6 in industry
Cyklostezky v Klimkovicích I. etapa - 1. část
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace zdravotního střediska města Klimkovic - opakování 2
Rekonstrukce budov
9
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení samosběrného vozu pro Město Klimkovice
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
2
Ø3 in industry
Poradenství a vzdělávání při zavádění moderních metod řízení pro město Klimkovice - ČÁST 1
Služby profesionálních poradců
9
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

34%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ptáček - pozemní stavby s.r.o.
1 24,726,171
Jankostav s.r.o.
1 5,924,651
Milimex S.a., odštěpný závod
1 4,475,864
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 4,437,000
Mepco, s.r.o.
1 684,000
Other suppliers 1 200,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (1 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

72%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 17% (1 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (1 from 6)