City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 20

IČO 00240192

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

6.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavba č.3295 - TV Horní Počernice, etapa 0012 - IS ostatní - komunikacečást Běluňská úsek Chvalkovická - Chodovická a část Sekeřická úsek Chvalkovická - Lipí
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
7
Ø6 in industry
Gymnázium a FZŠ Chodovická - zateplení a výměna oken
Stavební úpravy školních budov
9
Ø5 in industry
Půdní vestavba ZŠ Ratibořická
Stavební práce
20
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu Náchodská č.p. 754
Stavební práce
19
Ø5 in industry
Nástavba MŠ Ratibořická, zateplení a výměna oken
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Genel Invest, s.r.o. "v likvidaci"
4 36,073,237
Strabag a.s.
1 12,997,458
Orsmix s.r.o.
1 8,631,141
Your System, spol.s r.o.
1 6,788,200
Domistav Cz a.s.
1 6,199,674
Other suppliers 8 18,528,505

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 62%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zateplení a výměna oken MŠ Ratibořická 2299, 2. etapa - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
86,734
Zateplení Domu dětí a mládeže Horní Počernice - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
42,291

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.63

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (2 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

72%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (2 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 31% (5 from 16)