Small cities • 2016

Město Židlochovice

IČO 00282979

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

25%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ZŠ Židlochovice – sportovní areál
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
2
Ø4 in industry
Technologie pro kompostárnu Židlochovice
Traktory
3
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy MŠ na ulici Družba 673, Židlochovice - zateplení objektu
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Čistší město Židlochovice
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
2
Ø3 in industry
Konsolidace IT infrastruktury a nové služby TC ORP Židlochovice, Část A
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ohl Žs, a.s.
1 12,509,998
Garnea a.s.
1 4,846,000
3v & H, s.r.o.
1 4,699,999
A-tec servis s.r.o.
1 3,630,000
C System Cz a.s.
1 3,555,415
Other suppliers 5 7,367,244

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 4.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

73%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 20% (2 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 10% (1 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

72%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (2 from 10)