Small cities • 2016

Město Úštěk

IČO 00264571

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Projekt rekultivace skládky v obci Úštěk
Rekultivační práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Údržba, provoz a správa SDO Úštěk
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
1
Ø3 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření města Úštěk
Prevence záplav
5
Ø3 in industry
Provádění lesnických činností v lesním hospodářství ve správním území Města Úštěk v roce 2014
Zemědělské, lesnické, zahradnické služby a služby v oblasti akvakultury a včelařství
4
Ø5 in industry
Provádění lesnických činností v lesním hospodářství ve správním území Města Úštěk v roce 2015
Služby v oblasti lesnictví
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Lesní společnost Litoměřice, a.s.
4 6,167,584
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
1 3,894,766
Fcc Bec, s.r.o.
1 3,355,764
Tbo s.r.o.
1 2,307,133
Jacer - Cz, a.s.
1 854,078
Other suppliers 1 765,010

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

52%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 44% (4 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 33% (3 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

83%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (2 from 9)