Small cities • 2016

Obec Radiměř

IČO 00277258

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov ZŠ v Radiměři
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace Radiměř
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace Radiměř
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Zadávací řízení na dodavatele stavby pro projekt: "Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu Mateřské školy v Radiměři"
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
8
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace veřejně přístupné zeleně v obci Radiměř
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

38%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stating s.r.o.
1 9,831,033
Evt Stavby s.r.o.
2 9,694,883
Stavební Reality, s.r.o.
1 1,994,555
Okrasné zahrady arboristika s.r.o.
1 980,897

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

12%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Kanalizace Radiměř
Dodatečné práce
- 7,697,101
Kanalizace Radiměř
Not disclosed
- 1,997,783

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (2 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 40% (2 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)