Small cities • 2016

Město Duchcov

IČO 00266299

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

99%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení základní školy
Rekonstrukce budov
28
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení vybavení sběrného dvora v Duchcově
Stroje na drcení
3
Ø2 in industry
Odvodnění Havířské ulice v Duchcově
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
16
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení budovy oddělení NOP Městské nemocnice Duchcov
Rekonstrukce budov
9
Ø5 in industry
Mateřská škola Velká Okružní, zateplení veřejné budovy
Rekonstrukce budov
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
R-test s.r.o.
1 10,255,063
ARJES GmbH
0 6,835,880
Uniplast - dux s.r.o.
2 4,592,705
Horák - stavební a obchodní společnost, s.r.o.
1 4,220,221
Sim stavby spol. s r.o.
1 4,134,265
Other suppliers 1 2,999,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

42%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

63%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 43% (3 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)