Small cities • 2016

Obec Štěpánov

IČO 00299511

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dostavba kanalizace a vodovodu v obci Štěpánov a dešťová kanalizace Moravská Huzová - dokončení
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
5
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ Štěpánov-zateplení a související úpravy
Stavební úpravy školních budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Kompostárna pro obec Štěpánov
Kompostovače
3
Ø3 in industry
Svoz odpadu pro obec Štěpánov
Vozidla na odpadky
2
Ø3 in industry
Realizace energeticky úsporných opatření, Štěpánov, MŠ sídliště 555
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

22%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Modos spol. s r.o.
1 51,001,558
Energreen Projekt s.r.o.
2 10,115,000
Vhh Thermont s.r.o.
1 6,532,862
Stavební společnost Navrátil, s.r.o.
1 4,203,403

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

27%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (1 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 20% (1 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

64%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (1 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)