Small cities • 2016

Město Oslavany

IČO 00282286

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Shromáždění, sběr, přeprava, třídění, využívání a odstranění komunálních odpadů na území Města Oslavany
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení objektů základní školy ve městě Oslavany
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
„Oslavany, ul. Sportovní - zateplení objektu mateřské školy“
Stavební práce
15
Ø5 in industry
Separace a svoz bioodpadů ve městě Oslavany
Pracovní nákladní vozidla se zařízením pro manipulaci
3
Ø4 in industry
„OSLAVANY – REGENERACE ZÁMECKÉHO PARKU“
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

44%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 12,007,651
Rk - mont, spol. s r.o.
2 9,760,265
Osp, spol. s r.o.
2 3,277,111
Agrotec a.s.
1 1,735,000
Kavyl, spol. s r.o.
1 686,233

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zateplení objektů základní školy ve městě Oslavany - dodatečné práce č. 1
Not disclosed
79,288
Oslavany, ul. Sportovní - zateplení objektu mateřské školy – dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
73,690

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

13%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

56%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 29% (2 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

59%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 29% (2 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)