Small cities • 2016

Město Krásná Lípa

IČO 00261459

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

12%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Severočeské vodovody a kanalizace, a.s.
1 54,813,000
Děčínský stavební podnik s.r.o.
1 8,789,157
Jd Rozhlasy s.r.o.
1 2,160,050
Hanes s.r.o.
1 2,126,000
Generali Pojišťovna a.s.
1 1,217,246

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

65%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce požární zbrojnice v Krásné Lípě pro občanskou vybavenost a komunitní život - dodatečné práce
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Krajní naléhavost, Dodatečné práce
8,789,158

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 67%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

24%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (2 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 60% (3 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)