Small cities • 2016

Město Sedlčany

IČO 00243272

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

95%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Přivaděč pitné vody Benešov - Sedlčany
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø5 in industry
Přivaděč pitné vody Benešov - Sedlčany, dodatečné stavební práce
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
1
Ø5 in industry
Provozní budova SDH II.Sedlčany
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Dopravní úprava Sedlčany - Na Potůčku
Výstavba hlavních komunikací
7
Ø5 in industry
Dopravní úprava Sedlčany-Na Potůčku
Výstavba hlavních komunikací
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

3%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mota-engil Central Europe Česká republika, a.s.
2 357,730,748
B E S s.r.o.
2 14,340,325
Uniko Písek, s.r.o.
1 7,399,318
S-b s.r.o.
1 4,151,436
Purum s.r.o.
1 3,871,621
Other suppliers 3 6,650,053

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Přivaděč pitné vody Benešov - Sedlčany, dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
12,134,575

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 30% (3 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 10)