Small cities • 2016

Město Rychvald

IČO 00297615

The competition for contracts is high. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

80%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Stavební úpravy a zateplení bytových domů č.p. 1534 a 1535 na ul. Středová, Rychvald"
Stavební úpravy domů
4
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti pavilonů ZŠ čp. 1600 Rychvald - Město Rychvald
Tepelné izolace
14
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy MŠ č.p. 1744
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti Mateřské školy Václav, Rychvald
Tepelné izolace
21
Ø6 in industry
Oprava místních komunikací ve městě Rychvald
Práce na opravě silnic
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ad-mar Stavby, s.r.o.
2 3,597,125
Gu - stavby, s.r.o.
1 3,585,998
Stavby Complet Technologic s.r.o.
1 3,521,590
Bm servis a.s.
1 2,684,488
Strabag a.s.
1 1,521,184
Other suppliers 2 1,144,640

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 12% (1 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)