Small cities • 2016

Město Kladruby

IČO 00259888

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

5.
ranking
86%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

92%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dopravní infrastruktura v lokalitě Kladruby - západ (1. etapa)
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø5 in industry
Regionální muzeum Kladrubska
Stavební úpravy domů
8
Ø4 in industry
KOMPOSTÁRNA KLADRUBY
Výstavba kompostovacích zařízení
6
Ø5 in industry
Dopravní napojení obytné zóny Pozorka
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
11
Ø5 in industry
Kompostárna Kladruby-dopravní zařízení
Odstraňování odpadu recyklací
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stamoza, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 13,086,006
Stafiko stav s.r.o.
3 12,485,339
Strabag a.s.
2 6,193,946
Arbo, spol. s r.o.
1 1,498,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Regionální muzeum Kladrubska - dodatečné stavební práce I.
Dodatečné práce
- 263,349
Regionální muzeum Kladrubska - dodatečné stavební práce II.
Dodatečné práce
- 221,990

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)