Small cities • 2016

Město Milevsko

IČO 00249831

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

24.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební opatření na budovách 2. Základní školy v Milevsku
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Sítě a komunikace Švermova – 1. etapa
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Moderní úřad blíže občanům města Milevska a klientům městského úřadu
Počítačové servery
2
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení budovy MŠ Klubíčko Milevsko
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
6
Ø4 in industry
Kompostárna Milevsko - technické vybavení
Různá strojní zařízení pro všeobecné účely a speciální strojní zařízení
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Brick - Stav Cz a.s.
1 12,897,676
Stamoza, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 12,450,000
Datron, a.s.
1 4,552,500
Czech Builder s.r.o.
1 3,990,000
Akines servis, s.r.o.
1 3,930,000
Other suppliers 4 9,174,158

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 25% (1 from 4)
E-auction 75% (3 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 22% (2 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 22% (2 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 22% (2 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 9)