Small cities • 2016

Městys Jince

IČO 00242381

The competition for contracts is high. Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

90%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření kapacity Mateřské školy Jince
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
9
Ø5 in industry
B.J.8 PB-VB Jince (startovací byty)
Výstavba bytových domů
10
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti - Základní škola Jince
Tepelná čerpadla
19
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce důležitých místních komunikací v městyse Jince
Výstavba silnic
8
Ø5 in industry
Zajištění služeb svozu směsného komunálního odpadu Městyse Jince
Odvoz odpadu
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Invessales, spol. s. r. o.
1 9,784,326
Rios Příbram s.r.o.
1 6,098,889
Brick - Stav Cz a.s.
1 5,555,789
Strabag a.s.
1 2,736,387
Rumpold-p s.r.o.
1 2,717,370
Other suppliers 2 4,411,966

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 67%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

76%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 14% (1 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

64%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 14% (1 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 43% (3 from 7)