Small cities • 2016

Městys Vysoký Chlumec

IČO 00243582

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vysoký Chlumec tlaková kanalizace s ČOV
Kanalizace
7
Ø6 in industry
Úprava vodohospodářské stavby a technologické přípravny vody ke zvýšení její kvality a snížení radionuklidů v pitné vodě pro veřejné zásobení obce Vysoký Chlumec a části Víska
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Vysoký Chlumec tlaková kanalizace a ČOV
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Vysoký Chlumec tlaková kanalizace a ČOV - 2
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
"Poskytnutí úvěru pro městys Vysoký Chlumec"
Poskytování úvěrů
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

3%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pohl cz, a.s.
3 81,128,340
Bross spol. s r.o.
1 7,834,698
Česká spořitelna, a.s.
1 1,320,171

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 50% (1 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

56%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vysoký Chlumec tlaková kanalizace a ČOV
Dodatečné práce
- 7,169,840
Vysoký Chlumec tlaková kanalizace a ČOV - 2
Dodatečné práce
- 3,643,501
"Poskytnutí úvěru pro městys Vysoký Chlumec"
Krajní naléhavost
- 1,320,172

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (2 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

25%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 80% (4 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 80% (4 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)