Small cities • 2016

Obec Hovorčovice

IČO 00240214

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy a přístavba základní školy Hovorčovice.
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících vzdělání a výzkumu
4
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření a intenzifikace ČOV Hovorčovice,1. etapa
Stavební práce na výstavbě čistíren odpadních vod
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací 2014 – 2.etapa
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba a opravy pozemních komunikací v obci Hovorčovice
Obnova povrchu vozovky
6
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy a přístavba základní školy Hovorčovice.
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících vzdělání a výzkumu
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

37%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kaziko a.s.
2 25,148,661
Pohl cz, a.s.
1 12,225,355
Colas Cz, a.s.
2 10,286,034

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Stavební úpravy a přístavba základní školy Hovorčovice.
Dodatečné práce
285,677

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (1 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

46%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 20% (1 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 20% (1 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (1 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)