Small cities • 2016

Obec Želechovice nad Dřevnicí

IČO 75158094

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení obvodového pláště, rekonstrukce tepelného zdroje Základní školy Želechovice nad Dřevnicí
Stavební úpravy školních budov
9
Ø5 in industry
SILNICE I / 49 : Želechovice nad Dřevnicí, opravy chodníků/zklidnění dopravy
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
5
Ø5 in industry
Chodník a kanalizace v ulici Přílucká
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
7
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace kuchyně ZŠ Želechovice nad Dřevnicí
Přestavba kuchyní a restaurací
5
Ø4 in industry
Silnice I/49 : Želechovice nad Dřevnicí, opravy chodníků/zklidnění dopravy
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

2%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Smo a.s.
5 28,946,554
Profi Klima a.s.
1 1,638,731
Českomoravská záruční a rozvojová banka, a.s.
1 715,376

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Silnice I/49 : Želechovice nad Dřevnicí, opravy chodníků/zklidnění dopravy
Dodatečné práce
922,482
Zateplení obvodového pláště, rekonstrukce tepelného zdroje Základní školy Želechovice nad Dřevnicí
Dodatečné práce
899,311

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 43% (3 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

57%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 71% (5 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)