Small cities • 2016

Město Zlaté Hory

IČO 00296481

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Energetické úspory objektu Základní školy ve Zlatých Horách
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace a komplexní řešení centra Zlatých Hor - II. Etapa
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Rozvoj zlatokopeckého skanzenu ve Zlatých Horách
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace lokality Na Okálech - Hornická ve Zlatých Horách
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Energetické úspory objektu Mateřské školy na ul. Nádražní 306 ve městě Zlaté Hory
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Cone - Stavitelství, a.s.
1 11,704,975
Zepra mining s.r.o.
1 9,871,298
Manax s.r.o.
1 9,383,382
Awt Rekultivace a.s.
1 8,641,734
Staprom Cz, spol. s r.o.
1 8,078,009
Other suppliers 4 11,631,694

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (2 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

62%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
„Sdružené služby dodávek zemního plynu pro město Zlaté Hory“
Not disclosed
6,697,291

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

17%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 2.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

76%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (3 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (2 from 9)