Small cities • 2016

Město Zákupy

IČO 00261114

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu KD v Zákupech a Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu DD a DPS v Zákupech
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
NAKLÁDÁNÍ S ODPADY VE MĚSTĚ ZÁKUPY
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
2
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov v areálu ZŠ a MŠ Zákupy
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Snížení prašnosti v ulicích města Zákupy
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
3
Ø3 in industry
JŘBU - Dodatečné stavební práce k akci: Snížení energetické náročnosti budov v areálu ZŠ a MŠ Zákupy
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Emh stavební Cz s.r.o.
2 19,173,125
Marius Pedersen a.s.
1 9,353,179
Syban, s.r.o.
2 7,387,164
Hanes s.r.o.
1 2,073,800

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

29%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 50% (3 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 33% (2 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 17% (1 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 6)