Small cities • 2016

Městys Měřín

IČO 00294799

The competition for contracts is high. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

71.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

91%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kulturní dům Měřín
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
10
Ø4 in industry
Měřín, lokalita Balinka- II. etapa , inženýrské sítě a komunikace pro výstavbu RD
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
12
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení obecního úřadu Měřín
Stavební úpravy domů
2
Ø4 in industry
Mobilní technikou k čistému prostředí
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
3
Ø3 in industry
Výběr poskytovatele úvěru na rekonstrukci Kulturního domu Měřín
Poskytování úvěrů
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

32%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pks stavby a.s.
1 24,019,132
Content, s.r.o.
1 9,879,830
Gremis, s.r.o.
1 2,940,372
Sts Prachatice, a.s.
1 1,625,000
Československá obchodní banka, a. s.
1 748,441
Other suppliers 1 396,382

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (1 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

71%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (2 from 6)