Small cities • 2016

Svazek obcí pro komunální služby

IČO 47438541

The competition for contracts is low. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

21%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kompostárna pro Svazek obcí „Skládka TKO“ - stavební práce
Výstavba zařízení na zpracování odpadu
3
Ø5 in industry
OC Petrůvky - dotřiďování komunálního odpadu - stavba
Výstavba zařízení na zpracování odpadu
4
Ø5 in industry
Kompostárna pro Svazek obcí „Skládka TKO“ - dodávky
Traktory
2
Ø3 in industry
OC Petrůvky - dotřiďování komunálního odpadu - dodávky,technika
Drtiče odpadků
2
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka speciálního vozidla pro svoz komunálního odpadu
Vozidla pro sběr odpadků
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Outulný Vhs spol. s r.o.
4 25,431,077
Malcom Cz s.r.o.
1 10,387,000
Agro Trnava s.r.o.
1 4,994,000
A-tec servis s.r.o.
1 4,745,000
Martin Urban
1 1,596,080

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
OC Petrůvky – dotříďování komunálního odpadu - dodatečné práce
Dodatečné práce
- 2,243,819
Kompostárna pro Svazek obcí “Skládka TKO“ - stavební práce - dodatečné práce
Dodatečné práce
- 802,929

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 25% (2 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 38% (3 from 8)