Small cities • 2016

Obec Průhonice

IČO 00241563

The competition for contracts is high. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

78%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy - modernizace Základní školy Průhonice - II.etapa
Stavební úpravy školních budov
11
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulic U Parku, Příčná, Tovární a V Jezírku v Průhonicích
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø5 in industry
„Sběr, přeprava a odstraňování odpadu v obci Průhonice“
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
4
Ø3 in industry
Modernizace ZŠ Průhonice
Stavební úpravy školních budov
12
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka cisternové automobilové stříkačky, Průhonice
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pozimos, a.s.
1 36,988,393
M - Silnice a.s.
1 12,428,409
Fcc Česká republika, s.r.o.
1 9,573,593
B & J Holding,a.s.
1 9,412,771
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 3,500,000
Other suppliers 5 6,563,737

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Inovativni 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

67%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 30% (3 from 10)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 10)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

72%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (3 from 10)