Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Obec Průhonice

IČO 00241563

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

34.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dostavba a rekonstrukce prostorů tělesné výchovy ZŠ Průhonice, ulice Školní č.p. 191
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy - modernizace Základní školy Průhonice - II.etapa
Stavební úpravy školních budov
11
Ø5 in industry
Dostavba a navýšení kapacity MŠ Průhonice
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy - modernizace Základní školy Průhonice - II. etapa - vestavěný nábytek
Školní nábytek
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o.
1 38,900,383
POZIMOS, a.s.
2 37,884,386
CALIPSUM s.r.o.
1 24,500,000
JP-KONTAKT, s.r.o.
1 3,219,214

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 133,189,686
Unregulated purchases -46,693,773
Total 86,495,913

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Stavební úpravy - modernizace Základní školy Průhonice - II.etapa
Emergency , Additional works
895,993

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

79%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.17 (average mistakes per contract)