Small cities • 2016

Město Zdice

IČO 00234061

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

43%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zdice - výstavba MŠ
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy (modernizace) sportovního areálu Zdic
Rekonstrukce budov
5
Ø5 in industry
ZATEPLENÍ BUDOVY ZŠ UL. KOMENSKÉHO ZDICE
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Zajištění ukládání a likvidace odpadu
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
2
Ø3 in industry
ZATEPLENÍ BUDOVY ZŠ V ŽIŽKOVĚ ULICI, ZDICE
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kaziko a.s.
3 20,513,085
Spektra, spol. s r.o.
1 11,341,704
Zdibe, spol. s r.o.
1 6,000,000
Technické služby Beroun,s.r.o.
1 4,754,260
Hanes s.r.o.
1 3,549,000
Other suppliers 4 9,310,755

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Financování pořízení hasičského vozu
Not disclosed
- 1,774,830

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

32%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (1 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (1 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 67% (8 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (2 from 12)