Small cities • 2016

Sdružení měst a obcí povodí Ondřejnice

IČO 60045701

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is high.

32.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

84%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pragoplyn, a.s.
4 16,763,659
Amper Market, a.s.
3 7,441,205
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 4,448,766
Centropol Energy, a.s.
1 3,235,306

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

65%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 33% (3 from 9)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 9)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (1 from 9)