Small cities • 2016

Obec Zaječí

IČO 00283746

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

78%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ČOV a kanalizace Zaječí
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
14
Ø5 in industry
ČOV a kanalizace Zaječí - JŘBU č.1
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
"ZAJEČÍ - ZŘÍZENÍ MOKŘADU, OBNOVA VODNÍ PLOCHY V KRAJINĚ"
Výstavba vodních děl
4
Ø5 in industry
ČOV a kanalizace Zaječí - JŘBU č.2
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Výběr poskytovatele Technického dozoru stavebníka a koordinátora BOZP pro projekt „ČOV a kanalizace Zaječí"
Stavební dozor pro stavebně inženýrské práce
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

1%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ohl Žs, a.s.
3 126,736,119
Agromeli spol. s r.o.
1 4,278,153
Geotest, a.s.
1 1,609,500

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 50% (1 from 2)
Inovativni 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

42%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
ČOV a kanalizace Zaječí - JŘBU č.1
Dodatečné práce
- 21,645,221
ČOV a kanalizace Zaječí - JŘBU č.2
Dodatečné práce
- 4,105,898

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (2 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 5)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 5)