Small cities • 2016

Obec Spytihněv

IČO 00284491

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
NOVOSTAVBA SPORTOVNÍ HALY V OBCI SPYTIHNĚV
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Spytihněv - Komplexní revitalizace centra obce I. etapa
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Dlouhodobý investiční úvěr - obec Spytihněv
Poskytování úvěrů
3
Ø2 in industry
Vybavení sběrného dvora Spytihněv
Sledovací systémy pro uzavřené okruhy
2
Ø2 in industry
Snížení prašnosti v obci Spytihněv
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pozimos, a.s.
1 18,084,195
Strabag a.s.
2 11,128,504
Komerční banka, a.s.
1 2,849,000
Elkoplast Cz, s.r.o.
1 2,449,000
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 1,577,000
Other suppliers 2 2,562,377

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Spytihněv - Komplexní revitalizace centra obce I. etapa - vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
1,400,389

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (2 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 12% (1 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

59%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 8)