Small cities • 2016

Město Kostelec nad Labem

IČO 00236951

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kostelec nad Labem - Úprava koryta Mlýnského náhonu
Výstavba vodních děl
4
Ø5 in industry
Svoz komunálního, separovaného a bioodpadu, včetně mobilního svozu nebezpečného odpadu ve městě Kostelec nad Labem
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v Kostelci nad Labem
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
11
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu budovy základní školy v Kostelci nad Labem
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v lokalitě Cukrovar, Kostelec nad Labem
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Hydro & Kov s.r.o.
1 28,888,888
Stavební Firma Neumann s.r.o.
2 18,148,292
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 16,922,450
S.v.a. spol. s r.o.
1 7,780,570
Hanes s.r.o.
1 3,275,000
Other suppliers 2 4,463,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

31%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 12% (1 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

80%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)