Small cities • 2016

Město Trmice

IČO 00674010

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Psk - Průmyslové stavby a konstrukce, a.s.
1 2,737,425
Drug-out Klub, z.s.
1 1,900,809
Poradna pro občanství/občanská a lidská práva
1 1,836,694
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 1,765,000
Romano jasnica, spolek
1 1,677,952
Other suppliers 3 1,634,778

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 100%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

43%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 38% (3 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

83%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)