Small cities • 2016

Obec Bohuňovice

IČO 00298697

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace centra obce Bohuňovice
Stavební úpravy chodníků
9
Ø6 in industry
Cyklistická stezka Olomouc - Šternberk, poslední etapa Bohuňovice Štarnov - část A
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
15
Ø5 in industry
Rozšíření skupinového vodovodu Bohuňovice
Stavební práce na výstavbě vodojemů
6
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace centra obce Bohuňovice – II. etapa
Práce na stavbě silnic
6
Ø6 in industry
Energetické úspory vedlejších budov Základní školy v Bohuňovicích
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Kareta s.r.o.
1 13,949,007
Modos spol. s r.o.
1 13,878,938
Imos group s.r.o.
1 12,984,672
Šternstav Cz spol. s r.o.
1 6,797,072
Invest Cz a.s.
1 6,165,879
Other suppliers 2 2,603,820

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

72%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (2 from 7)