Small cities • 2016

Sdružení obcí mikroregionu Hlinecko

IČO 70151156

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Hlinsko - skládka Srní, rozšíření III.etapa
Výstavba skládek odpadů
9
Ø5 in industry
Sběrný dvůr Hlinsko - stavební část
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Kompostárna Hlinsko - technické vybavení
Motorová vozidla
3
Ø3 in industry
Kompostárna Hlinsko - stavební část
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2014
Zemní plyn
Not disclosed
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Meva-tec s.r.o.
2 10,424,840
Aquasys spol. s r.o.
1 9,694,400
Instav Hlinsko a.s.
1 7,869,069
Abk - Pardubice, a.s.
1 5,015,767
Pragoplyn, a.s.
1 4,535,473
Other suppliers 1 2,070,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

60%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2014
Not disclosed
- 4,535,473

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

76%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 14% (1 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)