Small cities • 2016

Sdružení obcí mikroregionu Hlinecko

IČO 70151156

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Hlinsko - skládka Srní, rozšíření III.etapa
Výstavba skládek odpadů
9
Ø5 in industry
Sběrný dvůr Hlinsko - stavební část
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Kompostárna Hlinsko - technické vybavení
Motorová vozidla
3
Ø3 in industry
Kompostárna Hlinsko - stavební část
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2014
Zemní plyn
neuveden
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Meva-tec s.r.o.
2 10,424,840
Aquasys spol. s r.o.
1 9,694,400
Instav Hlinsko a.s.
1 7,869,069
Abk - Pardubice, a.s.
1 5,015,767
Pragoplyn, a.s.
1 4,535,473
Other suppliers 1 2,070,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (2 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

60%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2014
Not disclosed
4,535,473

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

76%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 14% (1 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)