Small cities • 2016

Město Bezdružice

IČO 00259705

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

16.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

96%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce náměstí Kryštofa Haranta - 2. etapa
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce náměstí Kryštofa Haranta - 1. etapa
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
16
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Na Sídlišti včetně propojení s ulicí Sluneční
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
12
Ø5 in industry
Názorně, a proto zábavně
Vybavení pro výuku
4
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce příjezdové komunikace do Kamýku včetně návsi
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

48%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Strabag a.s.
3 18,071,682
Dybs Plzeň, s.r.o.
1 9,166,127
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 7,738,195
Kxn Cz, s.r.o.
1 2,088,550
Prolemax s.r.o.
1 889,985
Other suppliers 2 1,435,275

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce příjezdové komunikace do Kamýku včetně návsi - dodatečné stavební práce I.
Dodatečné práce
50,238

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 11% (1 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (2 from 9)