Small cities • 2016

Obec Ludgeřovice

IČO 00300390

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Mv Stavby Vjačka s.r.o.
3 12,368,318
Pohl cz, a.s.
1 10,428,343
Renostav, spol. s r. o. v likvidaci
1 9,716,705
Eva Žaludová
1 1,737,000
Zk Design a.s.
1 1,722,153

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

39%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 57% (4 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 57% (4 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

49%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 14% (1 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 57% (4 from 7)