Small cities • 2016

Městys Náměšť na Hané

IČO 00299260

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Komplexní revitalizace lokality Komenského
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce náměstí TGM v Náměšti na Hané
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø5 in industry
Zámek Náměšť na Hané - severní křídlo
Výstavba historických památek a památníků
8
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace lokality Na Hradě
Výstavba historických památek a památníků
6
Ø3 in industry
Městys Náměšť na Hané, okr. Olomouc – cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Modos spol. s r.o.
2 20,940,531
H & B delta, s.r.o.
1 6,914,838
Karvep stavby s.r.o.
1 5,990,000
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 5,078,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 67%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

13%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 80% (4 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 80% (4 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

68%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 40% (2 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)