Small cities • 2016

Město Jesenice

IČO 00243825

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

23%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu ZŠ Jesenice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací - ulice Křižíkova, Školní a 5.května
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy KD Jesenice
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
4
Ø4 in industry
Kulturní a společenské centrum Jesenice
Opravy a modernizace budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místní komunikace - ulice Hradní, Jesenice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kaziko a.s.
2 42,247,727
Froněk, spol. s r.o.
3 34,493,841
Miras - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
1 11,954,825
Drops Group a.s.
2 9,179,709
Erding, a.s.
1 8,494,575
Other suppliers 1 1,938,715

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

74%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 10% (1 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

68%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 10% (1 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 50% (5 from 10)