Small cities • 2016

Město Hustopeče

IČO 00283193

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Víceúčelové hřiště města Hustopeče
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
8
Ø4 in industry
V 000408 - "Zřízení prvků ÚSES v lokalitě Volská hora"
Vysazování stromů
4
Ø4 in industry
V 000407 – „Obnova krajinných struktur Křížový vrch - nové vyhlášení“
Služby související s odstraňováním plevele
4
Ø7 in industry
„Prvky ÚSES – Lokalita Čtvrtě, Díly a Kamenec a Obnova parkové zeleně v Hustopečích“
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
4
Ø5 in industry
Zavedení sběru biologicky rozložitelných odpadů na území města Hustopeče – dodávka
Kontejnery a nádoby na odpad a odpadky
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
H a S t, spol. s r.o.
1 12,518,988
Zahradnické úpravy s.r.o.
3 10,461,712
H - Rekultivace, a.s.
1 4,145,032
Gordic spol. s r.o.
1 3,165,000
C System Cz a.s.
1 2,702,513
Other suppliers 5 4,921,074

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (1 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 8% (1 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 17% (2 from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

67%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 42% (5 from 12)