Small cities • 2016

Město Hostomice

IČO 00233269

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kanalizace a vodovod Hostomice-Bezdědice-Radouš, zrušení ČOV Hostomice a nová ČOV Radouš
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
9
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace Tyršova náměstí - 1. etapa
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce lesní dopravní sítě města Hostomice
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace a vodovod Hostomice – Bezdědice –Radouš, zrušení ČOV Hostomice a nová ČOV Radouš - vícepráce
Stavební práce
Not disclosed
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace Tyršova náměstí - 1. etapa - vícepráce 2
Stavební práce
Not disclosed
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

20%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Šindler, důlní a stavební společnost s r.o.
2 82,745,115
Strabag a.s.
3 28,210,458
Petr Kožený s.r.o.
2 6,282,524
Kpcm s.r.o.
1 316,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 62% (5 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 62% (5 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

68%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (2 from 8)