Small cities • 2016

Město Řevnice

IČO 00241636

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Přístavba základní školy Řevnice
Práce na fasádách
12
Ø4 in industry
Zkvalitnění dopravní obslužnosti prostoru vlakového nádraží v Řevnicích
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø5 in industry
Zkvalitnění dopravní obslužnosti ZŠ a dalších objektů v Řevnicích
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
6
Ø6 in industry
Zkvalitnění dopravní obslužnosti ZŠ a dalších objektů v Řevnicích, etapa II.
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
5
Ø6 in industry
Přístavba a stavební úpravy mateřské školy v Řevnicích
Rekonstrukce budov
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Zlínské stavby, a.s.
1 31,231,000
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 10,699,994
Invessales, spol. s. r. o.
3 7,395,525
Froněk, spol. s r.o.
1 6,929,558
Strabag a.s.
1 6,295,083
Other suppliers 7 18,970,807

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 75%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

34%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 29% (4 from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 36% (5 from 14)