Small cities • 2016

Město Bystřice

IČO 00231525

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nástavba na jídelnu ZŠ v Bystřici
Stavební úpravy školních budov
2
Ø5 in industry
Chodník podél silnice II/114 Jírovice - Jarkovice, I.etapa
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
6
Ø5 in industry
Bystřice - rekonstrukce úpravny vody
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
5
Ø4 in industry
"Zajištění energetických úspor objektu Základní školy Bystřice - Stará budova"
Stavební úpravy školních budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Navýšení kapacity a rozšíření sběrného dvora Bystřice u Benešova
Vysokozdvižné vozíky
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

40%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stamo Cz s.r.o.
1 22,553,571
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 5,404,104
Radouňská vodohospodářská společnost, a.s.
1 5,232,014
Mamut - Therm s.r.o.
1 4,212,462
Elmoz Czech, s.r.o.
1 2,419,200

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 75%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

68%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 40% (2 from 5)