Small cities • 2016

Město Lázně Bělohrad

IČO 00271730

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kanalizace obce Brtev, vodovod obce Brtev - dodatečné stavební práce č. 2
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace obce Brtev, vodovod obce Brtev - dodatečné stavební práce
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace obce Brtev, vodovod obce Brtev
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Sportoviště Lázně Bělohrad
Výstavba středisek pro volný čas
4
Ø3 in industry
Dopravní a technická infrastruktura v areálu u Bažantnice v Lázních Bělohrad
Výstavba parkovišť
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

9%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Evt Stavby s.r.o.
3 133,262,135
Valc, s.r.o.
2 19,759,474
Pff - stavební společnost s.r.o.
1 4,195,393
Vodní zdroje Ekomonitor spol. s r.o.
1 1,604,629
Daniš Davaztechnik s.r.o.
1 1,439,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

4%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Kanalizace obce Brtev, vodovod obce Brtev - dodatečné stavební práce č. 2
Dodatečné práce
45,067,677
Kanalizace obce Brtev, vodovod obce Brtev - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
44,214,062

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

67%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 38% (3 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)