Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Lázně Bělohrad

IČO 00271730

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

27%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sportoviště Lázně Bělohrad

4
Ø4 in industry
Nakládání s odpady ve městě Lázně Bělohrad
Refuse and waste related services
1
Ø2 in industry
Sportoviště Lázně Bělohrad - 2. etapa

2
Ø3 in industry
Dopravní a technická infrastruktura v areálu u Bažantnice v Lázních Bělohrad

6
Ø6 in industry
Demolice budov čp. 28 a 27 ve městě Lázně Bělohrad
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work
7
Ø8 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

28%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EVT Stavby s.r.o.
2 89,281,739
VALC, s.r.o.
2 19,759,474
Severočeské komunální služby s.r.o.
1 13,439,896
NISAINVEST, spol. s r.o.
1 11,789,501
PB SCOM s.r.o.
1 1,583,643

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 187,073,672
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 87,522,375

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

1%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Kanalizace obce Brtev, vodovod obce Brtev - dodatečné stavební práce č. 2
Additional works
- 45,067,677
Kanalizace obce Brtev, vodovod obce Brtev - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 44,214,062

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 14% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.29 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders