Small cities • 2016

Obec Psáry

IČO 00241580

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

28%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění provozu vodohospodářské infrastruktury obce Psáry
Provoz vodovodů
2
Ø3 in industry
Vodovod Psáry, Dolní Jirčany - lokalita Vysoká a ulice Pod Kostelem a kanalizace Psáry, Dolní Jirčany - lokalita Vysoká a ulice Pod Kostelem
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Projekt revitalizace sídelní zeleně v obci Psáry II
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
9
Ø5 in industry
Pořízením zametací multikáry k čistému vzduchu v obci Psáry
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
2
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce povrchů komunikací v ul. U Nádržky a části ul. Hlavní
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
8
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

40%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodohospodářská společnost Benešov, s.r.o.
1 28,213,000
Zepris s.r.o.
1 19,380,000
H - Rekultivace, a.s.
1 2,751,485
Sap spol. s r.o.
1 2,590,000
Silnice Chmelíř s.r.o.
1 2,085,892
Other suppliers 4 1,931,453

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 100% (1 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 56% (5 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 11% (1 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 11% (1 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 44% (4 from 9)