Small cities • 2016

Město Votice

IČO 00232963

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is low.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výběr provozovatele VH infrastruktury – Votice
Provoz čistírny splašků
3
Ø5 in industry
Votický klášter ožívá!
Historicky nebo architektonicky mimořádně zajímavé budovy
7
Ø4 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE KOMUNIKACE - ULICE PRAŽSKÁ VE VOTICÍCH
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
"Multifunkční centrum Votice"
Opravy a modernizace budov
9
Ø5 in industry
"KOMPOSTÁRNA VOTICE - STAVBA"
Výstavba kompostovacích zařízení
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

26%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Compag Votice s.r.o.
1 123,927,000
Hora s.r.o.
1 26,483,335
B E S s.r.o.
2 19,027,734
Památky Tábor, s.r.o.
1 7,461,061
I.kamenická stavební a obchodní firma s.r.o.
1 4,740,134
Other suppliers 1 2,800,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce komunikace - ulice Pražská ve Voticích - vodovod
Not disclosed
- 2,210,239

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

69%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (2 from 7)