Small cities • 2016

Městys Luka nad Jihlavou

IČO 00286192

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Pohodář – pohodový stacionář
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Zajištění energetických úspor DPS Luka nad Jihlavou
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení MŠ Luka nad Jihlavou
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení objektu čp. 38
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Pohodář - pohodový stacionář, dodatečné stavební práce (vícepráce)
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

39%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Buildingcentrum - Hsv, s.r.o.
2 29,708,157
Mg-real, s.r.o.
4 12,005,397
Tomireko, s.r.o.
1 4,574,745
Kobit, spol. s r.o.
1 3,355,000
Alka Holding spol. s r.o.
1 2,805,662
Other suppliers 1 873,405

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Pohodář - pohodový stacionář, dodatečné stavební práce (vícepráce)
Dodatečné práce
3,550,000
Zajištění energetických úspor DPS Luka nad Jihlavou - vícepráce I.
Dodatečné práce
212,807
Zajištění energetických úspor DPS Luka nad Jihlavou - vícepráce II.
Dodatečné práce
Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (3 from 10)